๐—•๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—”๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐— ๐—–๐—ฃ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น

Most AI demos fail when tasks take time. A crash means you lose all progress. Business work needs reliability.

I built an open source platform to fix this. It uses MCP and Temporal.

MCP manages tool access for Jira and Confluence. It creates a clean tool surface. You add tools without changing agent logic. This keeps prompts focused on intent.

Temporal ensures durable execution. It saves every step. If a worker dies, the work resumes from the last completed step. It handles retries and timeouts. Human approvals become a normal part of the flow.

This setup adds more infrastructure. It is too much for short tasks. It pays off for systems needing high reliability.

The stack includes:

Split intent, reliability, and tool boundaries. This makes the system easier to test. Keep non-deterministic code in activities. This makes debugging simple.

How do you handle long agent workflows? Do you use Temporal or a custom loop?

Source: https://dev.to/ahmetozel/building-an-agentic-jira-automation-platform-with-mcp-and-temporal-1521 Optional learning community: https://t.me/GyaanSetuAi