๐—”๐—œ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฅ๐—–๐—› ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐—–๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก

Reading dozens of papers for one number is hard. You miss details. Your research gap stays hidden.

Use the I/E-O-M-P framework. Treat every study as four slots.

Fill these slots with data like age, dosage, and effect size.

Use SciSpaCy for this. It finds dates and numbers. It finds drug names and sample sizes.

A PhD student runs SciSpaCy on 30 diabetes papers. The tool finds sample sizes and effect sizes. The student finds a gap in long-term follow-up.

Follow these steps:

Verify primary outcome effect sizes. Human checks must be 100 percent.

AI handles routine work. Experts handle critical data. You get a clean dataset to find research gaps.

Source: https://dev.to/ken_deng_ai/deep-dive-extraction-using-ai-to-pull-key-findings-methods-and-populations-from-full-texts-136n Optional learning community: https://t.me/GyaanSetuAi