๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฉ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด: ๐ช๐ต๐ ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐ฆ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ ๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ณ๐น๐ผ๐๐
I spent 3 months building my SaaS with AI. But I was spending more time fixing AI mistakes than writing code myself.
I used to ask AI to "make it look better" or "add a filter". But AI would add something, then break something else. I had to fix bugs all the time.
I realized I was optimizing for speed of generation, not speed of delivery. My code had different patterns, inconsistent error handling, and security issues.
So I switched to structured AI workflows. Now I ask AI to execute a plan that we designed together.
Here's how it works:
- I describe the feature in plain English to AI
- AI lists the components, data flow, and edge cases
- I review the plan and fix the architecture before code exists
- Then AI implements the component as designed
This approach saves me hours of debugging time. I review a plan, not debug code. A plan review takes 2 minutes, while debugging generated code takes 30 minutes.
I use a structured template for each session:
- CONTEXT: what we're building and decisions made so far
- TASK: single, specific output
- CONSTRAINTS: tech stack, patterns to follow, things to avoid
- OUTPUT FORMAT: expected delivery
After implementation, I check:
- Does it match the plan?
- Are error paths handled?
- Is it consistent with existing code?
This approach cut my "fix AI's mistakes" time by 60%.
You can start today by spending 2 minutes writing down what you want AI to produce. Review that plan before generating anything.
Source: https://dev.to/pizza_cat/the-end-of-vibe-coding-why-i-switched-to-structured-ai-workflows-38j6 Optional learning community: https://t.me/GyaanSetuAi