๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฉ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ช๐—ถ๐—๐—ต ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐—Ž๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ I used Vibe Coding with Claude Code for three weeks on a side project. The result was messier than I expected. You can give Claude Code a one-line description and get a working app. I asked Claude Code to build a dashboard for tracking my homelab power usage. It set up a Next.js project, chose Postgres for storage, and added a Grafana embed. I didn't write any TypeScript for the first two days. This part felt magical. But when I added a feature, I saw problems. The code had three error-handling patterns. Two API routes used fetch directly, and one used a custom client. I spent a Saturday fixing things that would have taken an hour if I'd written them myself. Then I added a CLAUDE.md file with rules: one error-handling pattern, one folder structure, no new dependencies without asking. The output quality improved. I think Vibe Coding works when you set constraints first. It falls apart if you treat the AI like a contractor. I'm not sure this works for team codebases with multiple agents and humans editing files. Source: https://dev.to/ninghonggang/three-weeks-of-vibe-coding-with-claude-code-and-what-it-taught-me-9o0 Optional learning community: https://t.me/GyaanSetuAi