๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐— ๐˜† ๐—ฅ๐—”๐—š ๐—•๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—œ ๐—™๐—ถ๐˜…๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—œ๐˜

I built a bot for internal documents. I used a standard RAG setup. It failed.

The bot hallucinated. It gave wrong numbers. It split long guides into small pieces. It found the wrong pages.

I fixed it with two methods.

I added a reranking step. It filtered the top 3 results. I upgraded to GPT-4.

The results improved. The bot stopped lying.

RAG is not plug and play. It is a system design problem. How you slice and retrieve context matters most.

Tips for your build:

Source: https://dev.to/__c1b9e06dc90a7e0a676b/why-my-first-rag-system-hallucinated-and-how-i-fixed-it-cha