๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐˜ ๐—œ๐˜€๐—ป'๐˜ ๐—™๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—˜๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—ต

500 requests per second. One minute. Node.js failed. 15.5% of requests errored. Latency hit 3,318 ms.

Switch to a Rust addon. Same server. Same load. Latency dropped to 660 ms. Zero errors. It used less memory.

Bun is faster than Node for JS. It had zero errors. It is 1.8x faster than Node.

The numbers:

Rust wins on math. It optimizes loops. It has no garbage collection pauses.

WASM works for the browser. It is 2.2x faster than browser JS.

When to switch:

Rust has a cost. The boundary between JS and Rust adds overhead. This makes Rust slower for small datasets. Rust wins when your data is large.

Do not use Rust for I/O. Use it for math, parsing, and encryption.

Source: https://dev.to/boris9027/when-javascript-isnt-fast-enough-3ia2