๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐
You need database replication for high availability and disaster recovery. Your choice impacts consistency, latency, and failure tolerance.
Leader-follower is the most common pattern.
- One node handles writes.
- Followers handle reads.
- A follower takes over if the leader fails.
- Use this for read-heavy workloads.
Synchronous replication waits for confirmation. This protects your data. It increases latency.
Asynchronous replication does not wait. It is fast. You risk some data loss during failure.
Multi-leader replication lets several nodes accept writes.
- Use this for global writes.
- It increases availability.
- It adds complexity for conflict resolution.
Quorum replication uses a set number of nodes for confirmation.
- Writes need a quorum of nodes.
- Reads need a quorum of nodes.
- This system survives node failures without data loss.
Pick your strategy based on consistency needs.
- Synchronous gives strong consistency but slow speed.
- Multi-leader gives global access but high complexity.
Source: https://dev.to/therizwansaleem/database-replication-leader-follower-multi-leader-and-quorum-patterns-4i2m Optional learning community: https://rizwansaleem.co